|
The Case for Cable
Part 3 in a Continuing Look at Cable’s
Competitive Threat
Cable
multiple system operators (MSOs) reaped the
reward of having a lock on the video market and
a competitive position in the data market, while
the incumbent local exchange carriers – the
“telcos” – have seen their voice market eroded
by wireless competitors. That’s not to say that
cable companies haven’t had their own
competition – satellite video providers have
eroded the cable companies’ video subscriber
base in recent years – but their core product
(video) has been significantly healthier than
the phone companies’ core product (wireline
voice). That has finally started to change.
Telcos are aggressively rolling out competitive
video service over their own networks – Verizon
via FiOS and AT&T via U-Verse – and the trend
will only accelerate. The cable companies,
meanwhile, have hardly been competitively
stagnant. Their foray into the telco domain
with telephone service has extended beyond the
residential space, as the cablecos have targeted
small and medium-sized businesses.
Cable
companies have been pursuing broadband and
telephony options for many years. With their
core video programming market under attack from
satellite providers and, recently, telephone
companies, it is more important than ever for
cable carriers to extend their reach into the
data and voice markets. For them “triple play”
means survival. And, indeed, during the last
year the MSOs have achieved broad deployment of
competitive residential telephony options.
|
Table 1.1: Competitive Services |
|
|
Voice |
Video
|
Data |
|
Cable
Multiple System Operators (MSOs) |
VoIP |
Cable
TV |
Cable
Modem |
|
Local
Exchange Carriers (LECs) |
TDM
Telephony |
IPTV |
DSL |
|
Satellite |
VoIP |
Satellite TV |
Satellite Modem |
Source: New
Paradigm Resources Group, Inc.
Relative to the traditional telephone companies,
the cable carriers hold some advantages, such as
more robust networks that extend deeper into
neighborhoods. Telephone companies, on the
other hand, possess more robust networks in
business districts. Both hold enough cards that
a high-stakes poker game is clearly underway.
While satellite holds the distinction of being a
strong video competitor, the keys to the future
may rest in wireless offerings, business
customers and customer service. Will the cable
companies’ wireless partnership strategy pay
dividends, or will they eventually want control
over their own airwaves? Will the cable
companies be successful in luring higher-revenue
business customers away from the telcos? Have
the cable companies solved their customer
service weaknesses, or will their spotty
customer service histories come back to haunt
them? Look for answers to these questions in
NPRG’s future industry analyses.
For
past articles, including other entries in this
series on Cable’s Competitive Threat, please
visit our
news page.
|